Results of the year: the story of Privatbank

September 2, 2008 at 03:41 nn Under Uncategorized

Some of those present had already heard about this story, read the rest first. Maybe someone does help to avoid mistakes and not lose money. Links to the story in your LJ, on your sites and other places are welcome.

So, a brief chronology of events (and then write a fuller account):

September 15 with my credit card produced two money orders totaling $ 4870 USD (subject to 2% per transfer) - about $ 965.

16 September, I noticed a loss of money from the card, called the operator to chat, found out that the money was transferred through a system of internet banking 4 at the expense of Makoviychuka Vyacheslav Mikhailovich, a resident of the city of Sevastopol. Disabled Account 4 and a map. Using the search engine google.com, I found a site webmoney-exchange office, owned Makoviychuku and its number of ICQ. I got in touch with him, described the situation. It turns out that, although the translation was made on Saturday 15 September, but I contacted Vyacheslav Makoviychukom on Sunday the 16 th, the money has already come at the expense of Vyacheslav Makoviychuka, and he had already transferred to the account of the thief on the amount in the WMZ. Thus, money went into the weekend, without control by an operator. Vyacheslav Makoviychuk written claim to the purse, which had been transferred money. In addition, he promised to come to the security service Privatbank and write them a statement.

September 17, I went to Privatbank and wrote a statement on the return of funds.

Sept. 18 caused me to ours, Kharkov Privatbank security service. Oddly enough, not by my statement, and statement of Vyacheslav Makoviychuka I described to them the situation. They said that the passwords have been stolen from me, from my computer that is why in my application refused. I replied that with my Data.dat passwords could be stolen - fresh anti-virus, firewall, opera. Unfortunately, the qualifications of Mirgorota AA (or Mirgorodskogo Anatoly) is not enough to understand my explanation. He continued to repeat his version (apparently, learned the necessary sequence of words): I went to a suspicious site, rolled the window, went to another window to the site 4, scored a login and password - and the suspicious site has stolen my password. Thus, under the version Mirgorota (Mirgorodskogo?) AA Site 4 has XSS-vulnerability, which works in opera and not blocked by the presence of a fresh computer antivirus software. In parting Mirgorot advised me to something completely wild - call toll-free at 8-800 - ... and to present the operator's history. Why - totally understandable.

This week I again called Officer Mirgorot (Mirgorodsky?) AA and reported the following: they have traced the movement of my money and blocked the account into which money will eventually come. Mirgorot (Mirgorod?) Said that he does not have sufficient authority to refund my money and bring the thief to justice, and suggested that I go to SBU, to start using the SBU to find the thief, bring him to justice and return the money. By the way, is very characteristic that Mirgorot (Mirgorodsky) refused to call me his name, saying tolo name and patronymic. His name, I learned later in a roundabout way. As it turned out, F transferred money to the payroll card of his grandmother and took them out. Card grandmother blocked.

I appealed to the Security Service, they told me that such things are not engaged, and sent to the police.

I contacted Mirgorotom (Mirgorodsky), described the situation to him. He said that I must insist that the Security Service of Ukraine took my statement by him, the SBU must take charge.

I sent a statement to the Security Service by registered mail with return receipt.

SBU came to Mirgorotu (Mirgorod), talked with him, then handed the case to the prosecutor's office, as reported to me in writing.

Without waiting for a response from the prosecutor's office (already the 9 th of October, almost one month) I sent a statement to the police. The police did not have enough information for a criminal case, and it has requested from Privatbanka information about his movements on my map and IP-addresses from which the water in my account 4. Police investigators came to bank, and there he promised to give this statement quickly, within 15-20 days. " Prior to receipt of the statement in the opening of a criminal case I was denied. Looking ahead, I will say that no two or three or four weeks later the police this statement has not been - despite assurances bank. Only two months later the police came the answer from the bank's refusal to provide this information to the police (although the law required).

A letter from prosecutors that it is connected to the investigation of police of another area (not the where I wrote the statement).

A letter from which is connected to the investigation of that it became known that I addressed a similar office in another and they transmit all the data there.

In the meantime, I wrote three complaints to the for poor quality, biased, unprofessional investigation conducted bank. In the complaint demanded a refund and an internal investigation. Six weeks later received from the bank failure.

About a month I tried in vain to obtain from the bank's refusal to in writing. I was fed breakfast: "Three days later," he is now a lawyer, "it mailed to you by mail. Disclaimer I have not received so far.

In December, read the police's refusal to institute criminal proceedings and to rescind it.

I wrote to the two more statements: for me neobodimyh documents in writing, and the abolition of an unauthorized transaction in accordance with the rules of payment system MasterCard.

Meanwhile, the recipient of my money Vyacheslav Makoviychuk wrote two claim to webmoney purse the thief and returned the bulk of the money: about $ 50 a thief had time to waste on trifles, and 10% of the amount of the claim is WebMoney, some other interest taken for the transfer webmoney purse thief to purses Makoviychuka. In sum Makoviychuk got 3933 USD, which are translated for me (put it on my credit card, with which the money had been stolen, the department Privatbank). Interestingly, in the day when the arbitration webmoney decided to transfer the purse thief Makoviychuku, a thief tried again to log into my account 4 - apparently hoping that I would unlock it.

This Privatbank arranged another trick: on the check, which received Vyacheslav Makoviychuk were printed my passport details. I wrote a statement in the on non-disclosure of bank secrecy.

Once the above amount has come to my account, I notified the Privatbank (as usual - by registered letter with advice, because the office I started fooling and send a statement to another department) and police (while verbally after NG will notify the police and prosecutor's office in writing).

That's all. Total damages (including interest accrued to me that was about 1200 UAH (less than $ 250). Why do I bank a "grateful".

UPD: Vyacheslav Makoviychuk allowed to reveal his full name and city of residence.
UPD2: The police suggested to me that the name of officer Privatbank not Mirgorot and Mirgorodsky.

Conclusions:

What would be a good idea has not been the Bank and its Internet banking system, we must remember that is in our country - one of the heirs to the scoop, and all work with the client is done through an appropriate place. If you can hang the blame on the client, will do it. If not, will do it too. We are not a civilized country, where you can tell that this transaction is not authorized, and its Abolition.

I used to rekomandoval all use the services of Privatbank, now I will not do. However, in the opinion of most other banks in our attitude to clients is the same.

Two password (in terms of Privatbank) does not provide sufficient protection money. Therefore it is necessary to use additional protection systems, for example, to use the system dynamic passwords.

I would say that the services Privatbank better not to use. If you find a with a better attitude towards the customers, be sure to write about it.

Source

By admin No Comments

Employee Privatbank robbed of its customers

March 26, 2007 at 10:30 nn Under Privat-Bank - Features the national banking

does not intend to return the money from his pocket. Last week, the business became known that the Security Service filed a criminal case against "unidentified" officials of one of the offices Privatbank in Dnepropetrovsk. As they say in the decision to institute criminal proceedings, a copy of which has the wording, the staff Privat falsified the deposit agreement, without the knowledge of customers withdraw money from their savings accounts, and thus about a year awarded more than 18 million USD.

The Office of the SBU Dnipropetrovsk region confirmed the initiation of criminal proceedings against officials Privatbank, but from any comments have so far refrained. "Yes, it brought (criminal case. - Author.). There, several cases of such ", - said Igor Yanovsky BUSINESS, senior investigator for particularly important cases of the investigation department of the Office of the SBU Dnipropetrovsk region. "While the case is not a judicial decision, we have no right (to disclose its details. - Ed.)", - Said Igor Volovik, head of the press group Dnepropetrovsk Management SBU.

In the Privatbank not deny that the criminal case instituted against his employee, abused their official position. Moreover, a statement to law enforcement authorities turned himself Privatbank. Most likely, this happened after several citizens urged the bank to return their money on deposit agreements, which the bank had not been carried out by accountants. As follows from the case, one of the deputy heads of the Right Bank Privatbank office in Dnepropetrovsk received from clients large sums of money, gave them false return receipt, and style is nowhere recorded a deposit agreement. As a result, the money received by this officer from gullible citizens, passed the cashier of the bank.
High-level

According to Victor Minaylov, head of the legal department of Privatbank, the leadership of the bank was aware of criminal activity by a member of the Right Bank branch in May 2005 "in the implementation of internal control procedures." "Fact-finding Privatbank sent to the Office Ukraine in the Dnipropetrovsk region for the crime, "- told Business Lawyer.

As stated in the resolution of the Security Service criminal complaint, from March 2004 to May 2005 on the right bank Privatbank office in Dnepropetrovsk was decorated 110 deposit contracts, under which investors have made to the cashier office Privatbank cash, "as indicate incoming documents. However, according to the accounting CB "Privatbank", these contracts in the prescribed manner at the bank is not registered, the information on them (dogovorah. - author). Not in the database of the deposit agreement of the bank, and, accordingly, the funds made depositors of the agreements, the bank no "- the document says.

One victim told investors the business that the victims were served in the bank "as VIP-guests." During the transaction the money is not handed to the cashier, and personal bank employee in a separate meeting room, without witnesses, there also signed contracts. "A cup of coffee, a soft chair in the cozy room, no queues - all at the highest level."

Signed contracts with fictitious numbers conman has not registered in the accounts, and kept in his safe. Thus, in the course of the investigation in his office (an official of the bank. - Ed.) Have been found and confiscated 102 of the Treaty on deposit accounts with customers of the Right Bank Branch Bank "Privatbank", not made to the software system of the bank and no outstanding among the existing contracts of the bank " . However, the conclusion of the lime deposit contracts with VIP-clients and appropriation of money - not the only prank "unidentified officials."

During the pretrial investigation and "found evidence of unauthorized, without the knowledge of depositors withdrawing and appropriating funds from the deposit accounts of clients." This may indicate collusion of officials of the bank, because the procedure giving money to customers without participation of the cashier. However, lawyers Privatbank argue that the case was initiated on the criminal activities, "one employee, and not any group of employees of the bank or an organized criminal group". Nevertheless, the bank employee, even high-ranking, alone to withdraw money from the account of the depositor is not realistic. "This is possible only if he (moshennik. - Ed.) Through the electronic system to transfer money, for example, on your If this happens, it means that the bank does not operate a system of control, "- commented the chief accountant from banks.
Conspiracy

Some investors have already filed lawsuits after they were denied a refund. According to the victims, does not intend to return the money from his pocket. "We openly say: go to court", - said one of the contributors, who wished to remain anonymous. "If he (PrivatBank. - Ed.) Will return the money, we are ready to take action, and the world to go, but they do not intend", - considers the investor.

"There are no conclusions can be drawn only when the results will be a criminal case," - says Victor Minaylov. The lawyer also claims that there is "reason to believe that some (postradavshie. - Ed.) Citizens can themselves consist of collusion with the bank."

At this point in response to one of the claims for the amount of deposit Privatbank already filed in court of Dnepropetrovsk Zhovtnevyi objection, which considers the claims of the plaintiff's unreasonable that a waiver of the bank yet to return the missing money. The main argument of the bank - a deposit agreement is invalid because the conclusion was not sustained written form for deposit agreement, the depositor was not issued any savings passbook or certificate or other document that corresponds to the requirements of the legislation (st.1059 Civil Code of Ukraine). Curiously, for a lull the vigilance of inattentive investors crook of Privat, receiving money in return handed her "customers" meaningless memo, which actually could be the basis for the payment of money to the cashier of the bank, as are documents for internal operations bank.

Published online http://prostobank.com.ua 05.03.2006
Author: Vladimir Boiko
Source: prostobank.com.ua

By admin 4 Comments


Not only the blog:


Bookmark and Share

New Articles

References